Dear Bapak/Ibu,<br><br>Berikut disampaikan hasil pemeriksaan:<br><ul><li><span>1.&nbsp;Komite
FHWBC appreciate for your concern &amp; report to TMMIN Speak Up system.</span>&nbsp;</li><li><span>2.&nbsp;FHEBC
had investigate your concern / report with result as follows:</span></li><ul><li>1st
Accusation: Mr. ID [Pud DH] Select a printing company PT. AB supplier for TMMIN
(owned by Mr. ID's wife)

-
Initially failed the TMC in 560B

-
Then passed in D03B&nbsp;</li><ul><li>The
selection process was relatively easy and fast potentially infringement of
Conflict of Interest (COI).

&nbsp;&nbsp;</li><li>After
an investigation:</li><ul><li>PT.
AB was selected as TMMIN's supplier in 2023 under D03B through a proper
selection process.</li><li>Professionally,
PT. AB had already filed a COI declaration at that time (on 2023).</li></ul><li>&nbsp;It accusation is conclude: Not proven</li></ul><li>2nd
accusation about Sometimes Mr. ID (PuD Head) do power &amp; verbal abuse

Based
investigation &amp; interview with 10 employees</li><ul><li>There is no evidence that can
be used as evidence that Mr. ID committed power abuse &amp; verbal harassment. The act are Mr. ID's leadership's work style. &nbsp;&nbsp;</li><li>It
2nd accusation conlusion: Not proven</li></ul><li>3rd
Accusation: That Mr. ID was using his authority, he encouraged suppliers to be
assisted by PT KLL (an IT company allegedly owned by/related to P. ID) for use
by suppliers (i.e., Adyawinsa Stamping &amp; Dharma Polymetal) during 737D
(2023-2025).</li><ul><li>Based
on investigation that:</li><ul><li>Those
2 vendors stated that they didn’t know &amp; were not use PT. KLL for their
operation.</li><li>Therefore,
it is not true that there was any forced use of a particular vendor.

&nbsp;&nbsp;</li></ul><li>3rd accusation is resulted: Not proven</li></ul><li>4th
Accusation about Mr. RP (PuD DDH)

With
accusation for allowing a Conflict of Interest to occur due to knowledge of
irregularities in PT. AB selection process and transactions (2023-2025 Period) &nbsp;&nbsp;</li><ul><li>After
an investigation, there is no evidence Mr. RP allowing inappropriate activity
(Mr. RP did not involved in the selection process)</li><li>Based on
1st accusation is not proven, so that for this 4th accusation is not proven as
well.</li></ul><li>5th
Accusation that Mr. RP had frequent golf trips allegedly paid for by suppliers.
(The most recent one was reported by PT. Sadikun on June 23-27, 2025, in Bali,
with his wife) and in 2025, a golf trip to Bangkok.</li><ul><li>Investigation: After series interview &amp; investigation the 2 golf events accused were not
exist.&nbsp;</li><li>So the FHWBC conclude that this
5th accusation is not proven.

&nbsp;&nbsp;</li></ul><li>Even though the investigation proved that nothing was proven, the TMMIN
President, VPD &amp; related Director still issued a stern warning regarding
Mr. ID's negligence because he had been less sensitive to the conditions of
conflicts of interest in his work environment.

&nbsp;&nbsp;</li></ul><li>3. FHWBC
had did maximal investigation BUT if the reporter still have any additional
data, please do not hesitate to sent to FHWBC via such channel or related case#</li></ul><br>Atas perhatiannya, kami ucapkan terima kasih.<br><br>Salam,<br>Tim Pengelola WBS